[有奖问答]三式擂台-蒙古女郎情杀案

yong 发表于 2007-6-19 20:29:01

[有奖问答]三式擂台---蒙古女郎情杀案

<o:p> </o:p>
一位蒙古女郎去年在西马遭警长与其手下伍长 用炸药活活炸死。主谋是其情夫，有雄厚的政治背景，所以能利用警察帮他干事。<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
昨天首次 开审，试问案情结果会如何？<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
1]心动时间<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
公历时间：2007年6月19日18时 农历时间：五月初五日癸酉时　芒种中元 当月节气：6月22日3时8分夏至 当日干支：丁亥 丙午 甲申 癸酉国际易经网 www.iqing.net线上排盘系统 当日旬空：午未（日）　戌亥（时） 阳遁三局　值符天冲落八宫　值使伤门落三宫 ┌──────┬──────┬──────┐ │　　太阴　　│　　六合　　│　　白虎　　│ │　　杜门　丁│庚　景门　乙│　　死门　壬│ │　　天英　己│禽　天芮　丁│　　天柱　乙│ ├──────┼──────┼──────┤ │　　螣蛇　　│　　　　　　│　　玄武　　│ │　　伤门　己│　　　　　　│　　惊门　辛│ │　　天辅　戊│　　　　　庚│　　天心　壬│ ├──────┼──────┼──────┤ │　　值符　　│　　九天　　│　　九地　　│ │　　生门　戊│　　休门　癸│　　开门　丙│ │　　天冲　癸│　　天任　丙│　　天蓬　辛│ └──────┴──────┴──────┘<o:p></o:p>

[ 本帖最后由 shipotian 于 2007-6-20 10:40 编辑 ]

yong 发表于 2007-6-19 20:31:50

2]第一天 开审时间<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
公历时间：2007年6月18日9时 农历时间：五月初四日丁巳时　芒种上元 当月节气：6月22日3时8分夏至 当日干支：丁亥 丙午 癸未 丁巳国际易经网 www.iqing.net线上排盘系统 当日旬空：申酉（日）　子丑（时） 阳遁六局　值符天芮落三宫　值使死门落五宫 ┌──────┬──────┬──────┐ │　　螣蛇　　│　　太阴　　│　　六合　　│ │　　杜门　己│　　景门　戊│　　死门　壬│ │　　天柱　丙│　　天心　辛│　　天蓬　癸│ ├──────┼──────┼──────┤ │　　值符　　│　　　　　　│　　白虎　　│ │乙　伤门　癸│　　　　　　│　　惊门　庚│ │禽　天芮　丁│　　　　　乙│　　天任　己│ ├──────┼──────┼──────┤ │　　九天　　│　　九地　　│　　玄武　　│ │　　生门　辛│　　休门　丙│　　开门　丁│ │　　天英　庚│　　天辅　壬│　　天冲　戊│ └──────┴──────┴──────┘<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>

yong 发表于 2007-6-19 20:32:56

3] 第一天正式审案时间<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
公历时间：2007年6月18日11时 农历时间：五月初四日戊午时　芒种上元 当月节气：6月22日3时8分夏至 当日干支：丁亥 丙午 癸未 戊午国际易经网 www.iqing.net线上排盘系统 当日旬空：申酉（日）　子丑（时） 阳遁六局　值符天芮落六宫　值使死门落六宫 ┌──────┬──────┬──────┐ │　　白虎　　│　　玄武　　│　　九地　　│ │　　生门　庚│　　伤门　丁│　　杜门　丙│ │　　天任　丙│　　天冲　辛│　　天辅　癸│ ├──────┼──────┼──────┤ │　　六合　　│　　　　　　│　　九天　　│ │　　休门　壬│　　　　　　│　　景门　辛│ │　　天蓬　丁│　　　　　乙│　　天英　己│ ├──────┼──────┼──────┤ │　　太阴　　│　　螣蛇　　│　　值符　　│ │　　开门　戊│　　惊门　己│乙　死门　癸│ │　　天心　庚│　　天柱　壬│禽　天芮　戊│ └──────┴──────┴──────┘

shipotian 发表于 2007-6-20 10:39:07

这几天这案子在马来西亚引起高度关注，
各种传言在坊间流传， 甚至传出有幕后人物，阴谋论等。。。。<img smilieid="10" src="http://www.fengshui-168.com/images/smilies//168/em10.gif" border="0"> 此例只研究法庭下判的结果，被告未来是有罪无罪来进行预测。 鼓励易友们多参与实例。

yong 发表于 2007-6-20 15:15:48

2006年6月19日被炸死。

[ 本帖最后由 yong 于 2007-6-24 12:15 编辑 ]

yong 发表于 2007-6-21 16:51:52

1]心动时间<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
情杀案?<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
庚,乙, 丁在离宫临六合影射3角恋？庚,乙为表面看到的。庚入火乡，不能为力。 乙虽长生，生丁火，<SPAN lang=ZH-CN style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: SimSun; mso-ascii-font-family: ˎ̥; mso-hansi-font-family: ˎ̥; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">午月火旺木焚。看来庚,乙 皆 为牺性品。丁是岁君/上司在离宫旺为重要人物。丁在巽宫为副职，临太阴，暗中行事，是否此人主使？<o:p></o:p><o:p></o:p>

[ 本帖最后由 yong 于 2007-6-21 17:16 编辑 ]

gusgus 发表于 2007-6-21 20:33:43

用第一开审时间断值符原告被天乙被告所克值符原告临朱雀投江凶格白虎惊门与天乙比合克原稿六合证据证人生被告所有条件都倾向于被告不向原告原告不能取胜被告胜

shipotian 发表于 2007-6-22 17:02:41

直符逢奇生旺，应该是原告胜出。

SJ_0003 发表于 2007-6-22 19:21:14

一审应该不会有判决，而且法院向着三被告。小弟认为最终判决应该对被告有利。

wuyin2025 发表于 2007-6-22 19:38:56

按第一天正式审案时间，时干落宫生日干落宫，一审判决利于原告。 
按第一天开审时间，正好相反，终审可能对原告不利。
两局中多现戊，也可能结果是私下调解赔钱了事。
<IMG alt="<img" src="./images/smilies//168/em05.gif" border=0 smilieid="5"> 

[ 本帖最后由 wuyin2025 于 2007-6-22 19:41 编辑 ]

yong 发表于 2007-6-23 20:05:09

1]心动时间<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
31岁丙辰罪人与开门法官同宫，极有可能成为官方证人。但入墓[戌]又逢时空，且午月离宫旺克其乾落宫，害怕其威无直言可说。丁未月/日, 未刑开戌墓或戌月/日填实或有消息。<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
但癸时干为本案，未月入墓。事情在未月会不了了之。壬子月癸时干落坎宫上乘九天为旺，对冲六合[证据]落坎宫，癸时干旺可克丁岁君/主使人，通天之日夫？<o:p></o:p>

yong 发表于 2007-6-24 12:05:19

案情:<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
死者未死前职业是翻译员/业馀摸特儿。据说要纳索美金50万分手费。死者担任过马来西亚国防部翻译员涉马/法亿万军火交易。<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
丙辰和辛亥罪人是此上司[前国防部长]的近身护卫，庚子罪人也是此上司身边红人。<o:p></o:p>

yong 发表于 2007-6-26 08:32:13

yong 发表于 2007-6-28 06:32:24

yong 发表于 2007-6-28 09:19:40

yong 发表于 2007-6-29 15:13:25

以下这两个小插曲加起来可应这些象吗？<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
〉小插曲 1之2：2007年6月18日庚子罪人一家4人在法庭前，穿上背后写著口号‘以此事为荣‘的衬衣《<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
4=死<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
〉小插曲 2：2007年6月26日庚子罪人其公司，7名同事在法庭前高举白字写在黑布的口号‘以此事为荣‘《<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
黑布不祥之兆！<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
7=去<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
4+7=去死？<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
1]心动时间<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
4+7=47/9 余2  <o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
4+7=11/9余2<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
7+4=74/9余2<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
2=坤宫，死门呀！<o:p></o:p>
 

[ 本帖最后由 yong 于 2007-6-29 15:20 编辑 ]

yong 发表于 2008-5-10 10:50:34

<TABLE class=MsoNormalTable style="mso-cellspacing: 1.5pt; mso-padding-alt: 0in 0in 0in 0in" cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR style="mso-yfti-irow: 0; mso-yfti-firstrow: yes">
<TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=top>
Thursday, 08 May 2008 
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> </TD></TR>
<TR style="mso-yfti-irow: 1; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes">
<TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=top>
...while the Nation waits for him to wash dirty Mongolian Linens. Is RPK the Smoking Gun to Blow away Number 2?
  A political satire by Casey Sze Tho For now, while RPK sleeps soundly in a cell, Number 2 rolls restlessly in a closely guarded mansion. Who is in jail? Certainly not RPK. <o:p></o:p>
I woke up this morning thumping both my fists in sheer delight at the breakfast table in utter amusement at what The Star reported. This morning, The Star - <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Malaysia</st1:place></st1:country-region>'s government mouthpiece - added some taste to my otherwise dull plain black coffee. I drink coffee black, no sugar no milk, but that morning it tasted like black gold. So I gingerly lit up a cigar, smacked the paper in approval with a finger and showed my wife the delicious Star article. It headlined "Blogger Raja <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Petra</st1:place></st1:City> Raja Kamarudin was celebrating - by smoking too much - a day before the Government charged him with sedition." By George, this bald headed eagle is a smoking gun. Again. The article even highlighted RPK's gloat to good measure. It said, "I have been celebrating as finally the Government is charging me." When asked if he had slept well, RPK laughed and said he had a bad cough due to too much smoking. Well, he was either worried so he smoked and could not sleep or smoking a lot because he was celebrating so he could not sleep. Either way, he disclosed further that his 7 member defense team will be led by none other than our indomitable Karpal Singh in his spanking new wheelchair. RPK said that he would prove there was no case against him. He ended the interview by saying that this was a case of "political persecution." Maybe "yes", maybe "no", RPK. Because this time around you probably 'smoked' too much for your own good, so the government is placing a health warning upon you. The government wants to light a bonfire under your pants and they want you blown away. Beware fellow writer; writing under the influence of tobacco can be dangerous to health. Back to the business at hand. Well to charge RPK for sedition, to my mind, is quite ludicrous. It's like telling a cat not to meow when all it does all day long is to "meow and meow." RPK has been charged for sedition in 2001, in 2004, in 2007, and now again in 2008. He has spent some time in jail under ISA for something else but never sedition. Historically, this pipe smoking addict is slippery like an eel while he dances like a butterfly and stings like a bee against a shifty government.  But has this bald headed eagle finally soared over the line or is he merely a piece of astounding jigsaw to a wider conspiracy? Let's start by looking at the man. Who is RPK? He's a bald-head grandfather of 5 grandchildren, never went to university and for goodness sake, doesn't even look like a Malay Malaysian. He wears a hat for goodness sake and the only people I know who wear a hat in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Malaysia</st1:place></st1:country-region> are policemen or grass -cutters. He is a mythological caricature of overstated proportions and I dare say the government has overstated the stature of this man. Like thousands of bloggers, he may have rubbed the government the wrong way, but hey, who is rubbing the government the right way these days except Wong Chun Wah? I meant Datuk Wong Chun Wah of Star of course, who else carries a bigger rubber? This time around, it appears a consensus that the police action was ill-timed. RPK has been blogging for many years and as he himself pointed out a few days ago, "most of his articles would not pass the sedition or defamation test." Truth be told, RPK's language is caustic, occasionally vulgar and always sarcastic. He rubs the government on virtually every topic under the sun and he has a talent for telling stories 'truthfully' eventhough very often they are exaggerated tales or theories he conjures with an awe-inspiring twinkle in his eye. His magic is his ability to keep a captivated audience spell-bound to 'hyper-political probabilities' and to that we must give him the utmost credit as he is an excellent story-teller. The usual complaint I hear from people is that his stories are often too long; but then again, they are so compelling, people finish reading them to the end and then only complain. Everybody shake their heads in disbelieve to some of the hypothesis he weaves but at the end of the day everybody talks about how accurate some of his predictions have been. The typical comment I hear from everybody is that many of his stories are hard to believe but they'll readily admit them to be true to some degree and only disagree whether the degree is larger or smaller. My own view is that they are mostly true for they are told with the hawkishness of a bald avenging eagle with an honest-to-goodness glint in his eyes. If they did not happen finally as he had predicted it is probably because of the theory of compound improbability. An event predicted may not happen because in all probability, something else happens as an intervention in-between, so the outcome in the end is - in all probability, different. So one can conclude that RPK is guilty of writing a lot of 'unproven nonsense.' I am just surprised as you are that the government reacts to nonsense. Let's move a little backwards and trace the history of RPK's problems. First and foremost, for almost 3 years his <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Malaysia</st1:place></st1:country-region> Today has been printing nothing but only seditious materials. It will be hard to find an article where RPK does not sound like a broken record venting his anger against the government. And he bares all, with a thick coarse tongue even the dead will cringe. Even if you were to die, RPK will not mince one word for you. For example, when our big shot NAZA car man died last week in the United States, RPK suggested that this rich bloke had been stealing on car import duties from the UK, that's why he has gotten so rich!. So while the whole nation dearly wants to remember this dead man as a Malaysian hero, RPK made him into a thief even before the poor bloke could be buried. What RPK claimed probably is arguable, but you need a guy like RPK to have the gall to yell it over a dead man's grave. In truth, RPK always had perfect timing and when RPK whacks, you probably wish you were dead. It is best to step away in the direction of his smoke, so to speak. So should our government. And what was it he said in that offending article that got him into a boiling hot cauldron again this time? Absolutely nothing out of the ordinary except that it had more bad words than usual. But that's typically vintage RPK's style - when he spits venom on paper he does not suffer fools gladly. Yet minus the hyperbole in the article, RPK has told Malaysians nothing which they didn't already know. Ask any Malaysian. Every Malaysian knows who the killers allegedly are. They are these few 'special' cops who like to play with C4 explosives and toss them around like hamburgers. From whom did they take orders from? This is so silly a question. Any <st1:place w:st="on">Hollywood</st1:place> addict can give you the correct answer, so slap me.  Bad crazy cops don't take orders - just ask Clint Eastwood, ala Dirty Harry. Why, he'll spit on the floor, chew a cigar head off and spit again and then tell you that trigger happy crazy cops like to play with explosives, so what's it to you?  "Who is to know what goes on in their demented brains - if they had brains to begin with?" Dirty Harry will tell you. "These people will blow up an anthill if an ant bit them, so stop asking me bloody stupid questions!" Perhaps, just perhaps this time around RPK had spun his theory too far this time, further than his usual realm of tolerable creativity. That's why he is in boiling soup. For somewhat in this article, he has claimed that "Abdu#@! is an accessory to murder" and, quoting RPK, he is probably "burying evidence that will affect the outcome of the trial." Now the million dollar question: why would Number 1 want to do that? His primary pre-occupation before the election was sleeping and after the election was waking up to a nightmare. The only accessory he has is one son-in-law from Rembau and he wears that accessory like a tombstone around his neck. His only other accessory - Samy Vellu the Teflon Fat Cat - is probably the only other reason why he is getting less sleep these days. The truth is this fella has two nightmares every night not one and he is an accessory to no one except his new wife when he hits the pillow. So this is where I reverentially disagree with RKP. My friend, it is probably just only trigger happy cops that did it and no one else. The rest is your undomesticated imagination, probably from too much pipe-smoking, so quit before smoke gets in your eyes, RPK. But why would they charge this poor bloke for sedition when the election is just over? And when the government is talking of 'more freedom', especially for bloggers, with whom they are trying to recalibrate a fresh new dialogue? This all seems incongruous to me, unless of course, the timing is politically motivated. In <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Malaysia</st1:place></st1:country-region>, sadly all news is politically timed and motivated. It does not take an idiot to figure out that the main newspapers write only what the government wants you to hear. And today, they want you to hear that RPK "has evidence". What evidence? Against who? The answers to these questions are no-brainer and you do not need to ask me. Even your office cleaning lady will have the answers. But the whole episode does smell a wee bit fishy. Why do I say that? Well, UMNO election is in December; RPK is to rot in jail without bail for a few months until Oct 6 before the case goes to trial. RPK is probably given, fed or supplied with information that would incriminate Number 2. He sleeps well while his enemies cry foul. RPK does not need a computer to pen and plot evil. Thousands of other lesser mortals today are writing that for him. The drama king has now opened a flood-gate of hellnotes for Number 2. While he sleeps - in jail, that is - thousands of his fans are saying he is not the offending party. RPK is not guilty, has never been and will never be. To his fans, the ordinary Malaysian like you and I, he is, and shall be, never be guilty. Number 2 shares some headlines in this story if not in our imagination then at least by inference. On what, only RPK knows and the drama king is not telling -not until he finds himself in a courtroom with 100 cameras clicking. How incriminating the evidence will be is yet to be known but if RPK says he "has proof" and he would not accept bail, you can be very sure he has reasonably been given enough proof. RPK has hinted that he has some important disclosures and he challenged the government to repeal the Official Secrets Act (OSA) so that he could furnish the court with evidence to fight the charge of sedition.  Quite audaciously - quoting RPK from the Malaysian Insider, our embattled RPK said, "What makes you think I don't have proof? What you think I don't have documents?"  The sad truth nonetheless is, when RPK gives evidence in October not only will he be jailed for sedition but also for infringing the OSA. So you can expect he will rot in jail twice as long. I hope he won't be denied tobacco though or his publication <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Malaysia</st1:place></st1:country-region> Today will go up in smoke. Yeah, the evidence he has may be astounding but it won't be enough to keep him from his final destiny; jail course. Perhaps RKP welcomes jail since it is a good place to lose weight and wean off tobacco, no one really knows. His wife reported today he will not see her and he is on a hunger strike. She made no mention about whether he is also on a tobacco strike. God forbid, when he is released we may see a long haired skinny devil of a man gasping not for air but a smoke. Well definitely not enough to keep him out of jail - that's a price he is willing to pay  I guess- but enough to ensure that Number 2 will not be able to say in December, "hey boss, bugger off, it is my turn now!" No doubt when the evidence is leaked out by RPK in court it would be 'world sensational'. For it is not everyday you hear of people blowing up sweet, placid Mongolian ladies, so believe me when RPK has his day in court, the world's media will be camping outside the mamak stall near the magistrate court house, for tea first. Our teh-tarik is unbeatable and world renowned - it's tested in space by our cosmonaut, so they'll have tea while waiting for the canary bird to sing from the dock. Well, at best our Number 2 will have an answer to an allegation that is not true or at worst, he will have to resign and probably consider hiring Karpal Singh as his lawyer. The probability of him resigning of course is higher than Karpal Singh defending him. Karpal Singh is busy trying to slug Khairy or PAS sitting down. He cuts an unlikely figure to defend Number 2 because he enjoys Mongolian barbeques. Meanwhile in parliament, Kit Siang's penchant for high drama is more than striking nowadays since he lost his old job as Opposition Leader.  According to NSTOline yesterday, Kit Siang thinks parliament is somewhat beginning to look like Hollywood as he was reported to have shouted that RPK's sedition charge as "that is the beginning of a crackdown and the latest example of The Empire Strikes Back." Malaysiakini on March 7  further reported that Kit Siang did  not want to be drawn into a debate on "merits, or otherwise, of the contents of Raja <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Petra</st1:place></st1:City>'s article." Yet - Kit Siang being Kit Siang, he was quick on the draw that "the government should set up a royal commission of inquiry to investigate this so-called high-profile murder to clear the good name of this nation." This Kit Siang, he never learns. He likes to get kicked in the teeth time and again. The last Royal Commission, 'Lingamgate' my dear man, is not yet concluded and now he wants a 'Mongogate.' While on this subject, curiosity killed the cat. What ever happened to Lingamgate? Well, it sounded like we had a Royal commission on the Lingam Tapes, it looked like we had a Royal commission on Lingam Tapes but, hey presto, it's only your dreadful imagination - there's no Lingam, there are no tapes, the Chief Justice never holidayed in New Zealand and there's no commission. It's a 'royal' imagination. Friend, if you see Lim Gwo Burne in Parliament, he was in all likelihood smuggled there by Anwar because he could operate a camera unnoticed. So, what about my conspiracy theory? Well the timing this time is just perfect for a guy like RPK to leak out the facts to the explosive mystery surrounding the Mongolian murder. RPK's larger than life. He writes and has a strong following. When he speaks, he has a booming voice. He sits like a mountain and eats like a tiger. He looks dangerously like Vin Diesel. And by George, he swaggers a pipe on his tongue! What a perfect guy for a high noon gunfight against another guy who likes to play Monopoly with planes and submarines! </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

[ 本帖最后由 yong 于 2008-5-10 10:56 编辑 ]

yong 发表于 2008-5-10 10:58:57

I'd say this: RPK is only a means to an end. The end? The end is to get rid of Number 2. For all you know, all RPK will get in October will be a slap on the wrist by the magistrate and be fined $5,000. But Number 2? He gets the marching order outta Putra Jaya. They say truth is stranger than fiction. RPK is no Nostradamus but in Malaysian politics, he might as well be. He is the King of political drama and intrigue. In jail, he will be in heaven as there's where our drama king will get crowned. If he can light up some tobacco in his little cell along the way, he will sing like a mafia canary that is foot loose.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> For now, while RPK sleeps soundly in a cell, Number 2 rolls restlessly in a closely guarded mansion. Who is in jail? Certainly not RPK.

yong 发表于 2008-5-10 11:10:29

<DIV id=EC_EC_receivestrings><SPAN class=EC_EC_Apple-style-span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 12px; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT-VARIANT: normal"><SPAN class=EC_EC_Apple-style-span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 12px; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT-VARIANT: normal">Altantuya's killing: Who gave the order?</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=EC_EC_Apple-style-span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 12px; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT-VARIANT: normal"><SPAN class=EC_EC_Apple-style-span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 12px; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT-VARIANT: normal"> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Kim Quek | May 8, 08 4:40PM     Malaysiakini</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
A statement by Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak’s press secretary to deny any connection between Najib and the Altantuya murder has failed to quell public skepticism over official handling of the case.
 
This statement dated April 30 by Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad was in response to an article titled ‘Let’s send the Altantuya murderers to hell’ written by Raja Petra Kamarudin in his ‘Malaysia Today’ website.
 
In fact, the authorities are duty bound to pursue any leads involving Najib, considering the startling revelations made by third accused Razak Baginda in his affidavit to the court earlier last year.
 
In a desperate effort to secure bail, Razak’s lawyer Wong Kian Kheong read out an affidavit in court on Jan 20, 2007 which revealed among others, the following:
 
On 17 Oct, 2006, Razak sought the help of Najib’s aide de camp DSP Musa Safri to deal with Altantuya’s harassment. Musa then promised to send one of Najib’s bodyguards, first accused Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri to help Razak.
 
On 18 Oct 2006, Azilah met Razak for the first and only time at the latter’s office. Azilah told Razak that he had killed more than six people in the past and that he could help Razak.
 
On 20 Oct, 2006 (the day of murder), Razak called Azilah for help when Altantuya created a commotion in front of Razak’s house. Later, three plainclothes police personnel were seen taking Altantuya away in an unmarked car from Razak’s house.
 
The same night, Azilah phoned Razak and said: ‘Sir, you can sleep well tonight’.
 
On 20 Oct, 2006, when Razak met Musa in Najib’s office, he enquired about Altantuya, and Musa replied that he had not yet been updated by Azilah.
The first and second accused (Azilah and Sirul Azhar Umar) - who were both Najib’s bodyguards - are charged with killing the girl, and the third accused (Razak) who was a close friend of Najib but not a government official is charged with abetting the murder.
 
The question now arises: how could the first two accused have obeyed the order to kill from the third accused when the following facts are taken into consideration:
 
a) these bodyguards who were from the Police Special Action Force were trained to carry out extreme duties and to obey orders absolutely from (and only from) a superior like a ‘robot’ as testified by the deputy commandant of their police unit earlier in court.
 
b) Razak who met Azilah for the first time was no superior of these bodyguards. He was a civilian and though he knew the deputy prime minister he would still be considered an outsider by the two Special Action Squad personnel.
 
An order to kill from Razak would not have been acted upon by the two without clearance from those in the hierarchy above them.
Considering these bodyguards did not know the girl, and hence had no motive on their own to kill her, the next question that begs for answer is: Who gave the order, if any, to kill and to destroy the body in such bizarre fashion?
 
Tracing the sequence of events, the first target of investigation should naturally be Musa Safri, as he was the one who sent Azilah to Razak. And since Musa’s tour of duty is for Najib, shouldn’t the next object of investigation be Najib himself?
 
Have the police investigated Musa and Najib? Without their presence in court to answer critical questions, can any one blame the public for calling the police investigations flawed and court proceedings compromised?
 
And what about the shameful spectacle of the prosecution case, originally scheduled for one to three months, now dragging on and on to almost one year with no end in sight while time voids are filled with witnesses and testimonies of doubtful necessities?
 
Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has announced big steps to restore judicial integrity. How about starting with a small step by removing the eyesore at hand that may soon become the infamous Altantuya trial?
 </DIV>

小人物 发表于 2008-5-11 21:36:47

shipotian 发表于 2008-5-12 11:56:24

,yong 兄，下次发帖，请尽量使用华文，
外语很多易友不识

飞虎发表于 2009-9-25 09:34:51

葫芦僧判断葫芦案。........

baoshanl 发表于 2009-9-25 17:13:26

感谢飞虎兄，翻出很多旧案，哈哈，不辞辛苦啊

页: [1]

天機易學論壇(風水168)'s Archiver

[有奖问答]三式擂台---蒙古女郎情杀案